Quantcast
Channel: Air Transport
Viewing all 4332 articles
Browse latest View live

Russia Backs UAC to Expand Airliner Product Range

$
0
0
airplane

Russia’s government has given approval for United Aircraft Corporation (UAC, Stand J39, Chalet CD41) to press ahead with series production of the new Ilyushin Il-96-400M widebody. In December, it instructed the state-owned group’s VASO factory in Voronezh to boost its annual production rate to eight per year.

The move, confirmed in December, is part of a Kremlin move to reduce the dependence of the country’s air transport industry on foreign aerospace equipment at a time of mounting tensions with the West. It also comes as UAC is undergoing a further restructuring in a bid to be more competitive in difficult market conditions (see below).

Equipped with more fuel-efficient new powerplant, the new four-engined -400M now appears to be viewed as a more attainable and affordable alternative to the government-backed plans for the Russian and Chinese industries to jointly develop a new widebody. Plans for the Il-96-400M were first disclosed in November 2015 when Ilyushin general designer Nikolai Talikov addressed an aviation conference in Ulyanovsk.

The new model is a follow-on from the early Il-86 and Il-96-300/400 families, the main innovation being the replacement of the existing Aviadvigatel PS-90A1 turbofans with new PS-14Ms. The Perm-based engine maker developed the 14-metric-ton-thrust (30,864-pounds) PS-14 for Irkut’s MC-21 narrowbody and is now able to offer an uprated 16-metric-ton-thrust (35,273 pounds) M version (initially developed for the new Il-214-based military airlifter being developed by Russia and India).

According to UAC, the PS-14M turbofan will make give the Il-96-400M comparable direct operating costs to the twin-engined Airbus A330-300 and the Boeing 777-200. Eventually, the airframer hopes to be able to offer a twinjet version of the Il-96, assuming Aviadvigatel can fulfill its desire to develop a 35-metric-ton-thrust (77,160 pounds) PD-35 turbofan. Preparatory work for this program is based on the core of the NK32-2 engine that powers Tupolev’s Tu-160 bomber.

UAC is looking to exploit the more competitive pricing for Russian-made parts resulting from the falling value of the ruble currency since 2014. It also is committed to reducing maintenance requirements and costs.

Initially, the new Il-96s are largely expected to go into military service, for which they could fill a variety of applications, including surveillance and long-range air tankering. The Russian government is expected to urge Russian airlines to also invest in the new model. Cuba’s Cubana de Aviacion is currently the only carrier operating the Il-96-300, and VASO has been making the 160-seater at a rate of barely one per year.

New Regional Turboprop

Meanwhile, the Russian government also has urged UAC and its subsidiaries Ilyushin and NAZ Sokol to resume production of the 64-seat Il-114 twin turboprop regional airliner. This week, Russian civil aviation authority Rosaviatsiya is staging a conference to determine levels of demand for the model.

The State Scientific Research Institute of Civil Aviation estimates the size of the Russian market at 230 large turboprops through 2034, plus maybe another 70 aircraft for military use. According to UAC, this would be sufficient demand to merit the resumption of production.

The final decision has yet to be taken, but it is expected that the Kremlin may go so far as to restrict domestic sales of foreign turboprops, such as the ATR72, in order to bolster demand for the aircraft, which until 2012 were built by the TAPO factory in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Another prospective competitor is the Chinese Comac Modern Arc family, about which there have even been discussions over possible Russian production.

Currently there is only one Il-114 operating in Russia and this is used by avionics group Radar-MMS as a flying testbed. Uzbekistan Airways has seven of the type in its fleet, with these being the -100 version, featuring Pratt & Whitney Canada PW127H engines, as well as Rockwell Collins avionics and other Western equipment. The current standard Il-114 is powered by the Russian Klimov TV7-117SM turboprops, but UAC plans to adopt the new -117ST engines that have been developed for the Il-112V military transport.

The initial plan is for UAC’s NAZ Sokol factory in Nizhny Novgorod to assemble the new Il-114s from kits provided by TAPO, and also to restore existing aircraft now in storage to operational standards. The first of the new batch is expected to be ready to enter service in the middle of 2018.

The Russian government has committed to providing 27 billion rubles ($338 million) to support the program through the 2016-2022 timeframe. These funds would be available through federal funding to support engineering work and investment in manufacturing equipment. UAC has indicated that total investment in the production relaunch would be around $220 million.

According to UAC, the Il-114 burns between 520 kg and 550 kg (1,146 pounds to 1,213 pounds) of fuel per hour, which it says makes it competitive with the ATR72 (the published figure for the ATR 72 in cruise is 584 kg, or 1,287 lbs). According to Talikov, Uzbekistan Airways uses its aircraft up to 1,800 flight hours per month.

One factor behind the planned relaunch of the Il-114 is that licensed production of the 52-seat Antonov An-140 was recently discontinued. This followed the refusal of Ukrainian companies, including Antonov, to supply components and parts to their Russian partners.

The Il-114 achieved type certification in 1997. UAC does intend to make changes to the position of wing consoles with a view to improving yaw and bank stability at slow speeds. This would allow the maximum 40-degree flap deflection (compared with 20 degrees for the existing aircraft), significantly reducing approach speeds and so requiring less landing distance. The new aircraft would also feature electrically-powered anti-icing systems and some improvements to the cockpit.

More UAC Restructuring

The relaunch of Il-114 production is part of wider strategic changes announced by UAC president Yuri Slyusar. As it grapples with the impact of Russia’s economic downturn, and the drop in value of the ruble on currency markets, the group is looking to “strengthen cooperation with other manufacturers, including foreign ones, to open UAC production facilities to the most capable partners. Through further outsourcing, the company says it expects to reduce the number of final assembly plants in the process.

In other reforms, UAC is establishing five new divisions, responsible for “commercial, combat, transport, special purpose aviation, as well as for aircraft maintenance and support.” In addition to Ilyushin, the group combines design bureau brands such as Sukhoi, MiG and Tupolev. Its most advanced aircraft program is the PAKFA fifth generation T-50 fighter, for which two new prototypes are set to begin flight testing soon to evaluate combat mode performance and weaponry integration and use.

Already in production is the Superjet SSJ100 narrowbody airliner. This program has benefitted from around $500 million in government funds released to the State Transport Leasing Company to support sales to operators such as Yamal Airlines, which is to get 25 aircraft, and Kazakhstan-based SCAT, which has 15 on order, plus 5 options.

February 15, 2016, 1:10 AM

AAPA Says Investment is Needed in Infrastructure

$
0
0
airplane taking off

With lower oil prices helping carriers to increase profitability, Asian airlines saw a modest recovery in 2015, while passengers continued to benefit from “affordable airfares,” according to Andrew Herdman, director general of the 16-strong Asia Pacific Airlines Association (AAPA)*. “This region hosts some of the most-fiercely competitive markets and some of the most innovative airlines. Up to a dozen airlines compete on some international routes in Asia.”

Herdman said that although the Asia Pacific is well established as the industry’s largest market, with the highest share of traffic and passengers, various “innovative” approaches by the region’s airlines had led to a diversity of product and service offerings and an intensely competitive market.

With yet-to-be-released December traffic figures expected to be in line with earlier 2015 trends, including solid growth in passenger numbers, Herdman reported contrasting cargo markets that “remain relatively weak” and reflected on the slowdown in global trade activity.

Preliminary traffic (revenue passenger-miles/kilometre [RPM/K]) figures for January-November show that 31 Asian airlines (including AAPA non-members) carried 252 million international passengers, up 8.1 percent from 2014’s equivalent period.

Demand remained strong despite overall weakness in Asian currencies and moderation in emerging market economies, according to AAPA. Growth in air cargo (freight ton/metric ton-miles/kilometres) fell to 1.8 percent.

Air passenger demand remains strong, supported by affordable airfares resulting from persistently low oil prices,” observed Herdman. “Less encouragingly, air cargo is suffering from market weakness in major trading economies, signs of inventory ‘overhang,’ and excess capacity.”

The AAPA executive said that airline business strategies are responding to changes in market demand and consumer preferences. “Overall, the region’s airlines are focused on responding appropriately to evolving patterns of market demand, while making efforts to increase operational efficiency and boost profitability,” he added.

The performance follows “consistently strong” growth in air-travel demand in recent years, with record numbers of business and leisure passengers. “The Asia Pacific region has recorded faster-than-average growth and this is expected to continue, in line with economic and social development,” Herdman told AIN. Nevertheless, airline profitability remains challenging: “For 2014, Asia Pacific airlines in aggregate reported only a break-even result for the year.”

In fact, the director general’s report to the annual AAPA presidents’ meeting late last year disclosed that “combined AAPA and non-AAPA airlines” incurred a $1 billion loss on revenue of $176 billion in 2014. Operating about 6,300 aircraft, they carried 1,100 million passengers–about 70 percent domestic travellers–and 20 million metric tons (equivalent to 22 million U.S. (2,000-lb) tons) of cargo; globally, these volumes represented 31 percent of passenger traffic and 38 percent of cargo traffic, respectively.

Slightly higher growth in passenger traffic (RPM/Ks) than in traveler numbers shows that average distances flown had increased. Herdman attributes this to robust all-round demand, with greater affordability arising from lower fuel prices that stimulated business on medium- and long-haul services. In late 2015, jet fuel prices were “averaging $67 per barrel, compared to $113 last year, reflecting plentiful supply,” he told AAPA presidents.

Another factor is continuing social and economic development, with tourism a key contributor, said Herdman. “Rising incomes and a fast-growing middle class–all key ingredients for growth in demand–are seen in the wider Asia Pacific region. By all measures, [it] is already the global leader in passenger- and freight-traffic volumes. The world’s 10 busiest international routes are in Asia Pacific.”

As to the significance of low-cost carriers (LCCs) for the region’s full-service operators, Herdman said: “The emergence and growth of LCCs has had a significant impact, particularly on short-haul domestic and regional routes. Full-service operators have responded by streamlining cost structures, sometimes establishing low-cost subsidiary airlines,” according to the AAPA director general.

Over time, he also has seen increasing convergence between different operating strategies, with airlines adapting to different market circumstances. “As LCCs have expanded into regional markets, they have started using [various] distribution channels, and cooperating with other airlines using interline feeds for additional revenue optimization.” Some LCCs have expanded into medium- and long-haul markets using larger widebody aircraft, often offering two classes of service and underfloor cargo capacity, he added.

Expanding route networks allows LCCs to use connecting services, opening new revenue opportunities and operational challenges. “The traditional distinctions between differing airline business models have become increasingly blurred,” notes Herdman. “[But] despite the rapid growth of new-entrant airlines, the established network airlines continue to capture the lion’s share of [worldwide] industry revenues.” 

 Widebody LCC Aircraft

The introduction of LCC widebody aircraft able to carry belly freight increases market capacity, with inevitable consequences for cargo traffic and profitability in the region. “Cargo operators have been experiencing difficult market conditions for the past several years. Since the global financial crisis, international trade has grown no faster than GDP, in marked contrast to the previous two decades when trade typically expanded at twice the rate of global GDP growth,” according to Herdman.

Consequently, the industry has been characterized by “relatively weak demand, and highly competitive shipping rates. With the overall volume of cargo not growing as much as had been expected, and with the share carried by passenger aircraft increasing, there is an oversupply in capacity, particularly for dedicated freighter aircraft which have seen falling values and lower utilization.”

Looking at the region’s forecast 5-6 percent continuing annual growth and with the region projected to order around 40 percent of all new aircraft over the next 20 years, AAPA is concerned that adequate provision be made to accommodate the expansion. “The growth in traffic demand is creating infrastructure challenges, and even the best-managed airports are showing signs of congestion today, notably during peak hours. It is critically important that the associated aviation infrastructure, including airports, runways, terminal capacity and air-navigation services, keeps pace.

Failure to do so can quickly lead to congestion and degraded service levels for the travelling public in operational delays and other inefficiencies. Governments have an important role to play in ensuring that proper planning processes are in place and co-ordinating effective collaboration among stakeholders, including airlines and other service providers,” concluded Herdman.

*AAPA member carriers: Air Astana, All Nippon Airways, Asiana Airlines, Bangkok Airways, Cathay Pacific Airways, China Airlines, Dragonair, EVA Airways, Garuda Indonesia, Japan Airlines, Korean Air Lines, Malaysia Airlines, Philippine Airlines, Royal Brunei Airlines, Singapore Airlines, and Thai Airways International. 

February 15, 2016, 9:45 AM

Mitsubishi Details Delays to MRJ

$
0
0

Mitsubishi Aircraft (MITAC) has modified the first Mitsubishi Regional Jet (MRJ) 90 since its initial three flights last November and was due to have re-flown the machine ahead of this week’s airshow. It’s Japan’s first domestically developed passenger airliner since the NAMCYS-11 regional turboprop more than 50 years ago. Taxying tests with the updated aircraft scheduled for “early February” were planned to follow functional tests performed during January.

Meanwhile, the MRJ90’s entry into service has been postponed for a further year to the second quarter of 2018–the program’s fourth delay–even as launch customer All Nippon Airways (ANA) has conducted its first acceptance inspection of the initial delivery aircraft.

MITAC (Stand U01) flew the first flight-test aircraft (FTA-1) three times in November before withdrawing the machine from operation to incorporate planned structural and systems changes. The manufacturer has confirmed the design’s “basic characteristics and functionality.” Analysis of the flights, including operation of landing gear and flaps (but not reverse thrust), verified performance “according to specifications” and complemented feedback from ground and taxi tests.

In late January, Mitsubishi revealed details of planned airframe strengthening modifications after having analyzed static test results last year that indicated a weakness in the airframe and wing attachment. “Some components that join the wing and the fuselage, as well as those of the fuselage frame, would have insufficient strength [during ultimate load tests],” according to the manufacturer.

As a result, additional “plates” have been introduced to reinforce original parts.  Mitsubishi had deemed that modification unnecessary ahead of first flight, for which the Japanese Civil Aviation Board issued a special permit in October. “But we decided to implement the upgrades during this round of feedback upgrades,” said MITAC.

Type certification requires the airframe to withstand a load 50 percent greater than the limit load (the highest expected to be experienced in operation). Other changes comprise software upgrades to avionics, and engine- and flight-control systems, with the modifications also being applied to the second MRJ (FTA-2).

Functional testing of third aircraft (FTA-3) began in January, as MITAC installed final systems parts and cabin interiors on FTA-4 and FTA-5, which were in final assembly. All four remaining flight-test MRJ90s are slated to fly during 2016, as trials continue on two further airframes constructed for static- and fatigue-strength tests. Mitsubishi has completed assembling major structures for the latter test specimen, which by late January was standing on its own landing gear and measuring instruments were being installed.

In revising the MRJ initial delivery schedule, MITAC and parent Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) have extended the time available for flight trials in both Japan and the U.S., and testing now may continue into early 2018. The two years previously allotted by the two companies for flight testing, certification, and entry into service has now grown to at least 30 months.

Time for related ground testing also is increased by about 50 percent. Looking ahead, Mitsubishi says it will be “increasing the precision” of its scheduling and will start U.S. flight testing “as soon as feasible to propel development.”

Initial MRJ flights came after ground and engineering tests and final aircraft inspection in September. MITAC then analyzed results from 13 formal taxiing trials conducted over five weeks starting October 3. Taxiing had begun slowly in June, at the same time as ground vibration tests with second MRJ90FTA-2, according to MITAC senior executive vice-president and executive chief engineer Nobuo Kishi. This work was followed during July and August by “test feedback modification and technical data checks.”

The October taxi trials saw MITAC test braking (including emergency stop and rejected take-off), nosewheel steering, and expanding the speed range up to 120 knots. The MRJ’s three flights, at Tokyo’s Nagoya Airport between November 11 and 27, covered take-off and landing performance, ascent (to 15,000 feet) and descent, cruise (up to 200 knots), and turns, as well as landing-gear and flap operation (0-30 degrees).

Confirming the latest delivery-schedule revision in late December, MHI and MITAC acknowledged that the review reflected additions to (and revisions of) original test items, as well as Mitsubishi’s joint engineering work with U.S. partners aimed at ensuring a “better-integrated” aircraft. This has resulted in a new MRJ development structure intended to ensure “prompt execution” of all activities, with roles and responsibilities assigned among three engineering bases in the two countries.

Tokyo-based MITAC will look after Type Certification documentation and co-ordination with airworthiness authorities, flight tests, manufacturing preparation (including design and production), and customer support. In the U.S., the Seattle Engineering Center, an engineering arm of subsidiary MITAC America opened last August. It has taken over design development and also is charged with innovating technological “solutions.”

This fourth MRJ delay, which follows discussions with U.S. partner Aerospace Testing Engineering & Certification (AeroTEC), will permit much more time for testing, both on the ground and in the air. AeroTEC’s Moses Lake Test Center at Grant County International Airport (Washington state) is the site for American flight tests and support, including data analysis and report writing. AeroTEC provides data analysis, FAA certification and flight-testing services to manufacturers like Honeywell and Lockheed Martin and aircraft modification companies such as Aviation Partners Boeing and Raisbeck Engineering.

After consulting AeroTEC, Mitsubishi has taken a more realistic approach to scheduling the MRJ flight-test program. Discussions had stimulated caution last year as the manufacturer approached the MRJ’s flight readiness, with more time being devoted to checking each step. A thorough review identified a number of different items that were added to pre-flight-test work.

MITAC officials acknowledge the value of a more-pragmatic approach, even though further delay has almost certainly further eroded the project’s waning credibility. For example, Kishi has described plans to deliver the first MRJ before July 2017 as having been “naïve and based on incomplete knowledge.”

MHI executive vice president (and since April 2015 MITAC president) Hiromichi Morimoto said when the latest delay was revealed at the end of last year: “We’re still feeling our way along, and often lack the ability to take decisive action. We have frequently not been able to make quick decisions when the time has come to do so.”

Kishi has also admitted that further work is required on the aircraft and in reaching agreement with suppliers. He says that MRJ’s landing gear and wheels need to be “redesigned for better safety,” while he is also talking with engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney about a revised schedule for supplying the aircraft’s PW1200G-JM geared-turbofans.

In December, MITAC and Boeing unveiled their joint development of the My MRJ Fleet.com (MMF) customer-support service web portal. Construction also has began at MHI’s Kobe Shipyard & Machinery Works for a new factory to build MRJ wings. Main wing skins/spars and the center wing will be manufactured under an integrated system in the 5,600-sq-m new factory and an adjacent 25,400-sq-m plant.

ANA’s mid-January acceptance inspection and approval covered the first-delivery MRJ’s “wing framework assembly” at MHI’s Nagoya Aerospace Systems plant at Tobishima. Such on-site customer inspections are set at several points within MITAC’s manufacturing process, and include the structural state of fuselage, tail assembly, wing, and other components, as well as component integration, and system parts’ installation. Final ground and in-flight inspections will precede delivery, says MITAC.

February 15, 2016, 9:58 AM

Lufthansa Technik Seeks Major Asia Pacific A350 XWB and 777X MRO Role

$
0
0
Rolls-Royce and Airbus expect to log about 120 hours’ flying over about nine months with the new 97,000-pound-thrust Trent XWB-97 engine for the stretched A350-1000 XWB on the airframe manufacturer’s A380 flying testbed.

Lufthansa Technik is creating an Airbus A350XWB spares pool in Hong Kong as the initial step in an effort to become a leading provider for maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) of the new Airbus widebody in the Asia Pacific region.

Hamburg-based Lufthansa Technik (LHT, Stand K65) has also completed various Asia Pacific construction and MRO service-expansion efforts aimed at securing new business from the introduction of new aircraft types–including the A350XWB and Boeing 777X–ordered in large numbers by the region’s airlines.

Addressing LHT’s decision to create an A350XWB spares pool in Asia, Gerald Steinhoff, the company’s senior v-p corporate sales Asia Pacific, said, “The most important need for our customers is parts availability and reliability. It is more important where our A350 material will be placed and how fast it can be delivered to the airlines…than having [MRO] capabilities in the area. Therefore we have decided–as a first step–to open up a pool location in Hong Kong.”

Other developments such as an A350XWBMRO partnership could follow. “There is a certain interest [among] potential partners in the area, who are interested to cooperate with LHT in building up capabilities in a joint approach,” said Steinhoff.

Although LHT is focusing on the Asia Pacific region for A350XWBMRO business development, because “the majority of A350 operators are based in the Asia Pacific region,” the company’s decision to locate an A350XWB spares pool at Hong Kong suggests LHT could regard Cathay Pacific Airways as a key potential partner in winning the work.

Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific has 22 A350-900s and 26 A350-1000s on order and was due to receive its first A350-900 in February. Lufthansa itself will receive in November the first of 25 A350-900s it ordered and a dedicated LHT“entry-into-service” team is now preparing for Lufthansa’s A350-900 phase-in.

However, LHT began offering A350XWBMRO services in January 2015 by providing turnaround checks for Qatar Airways’ A350-900s at Frankfurt, with the support of that carrier. LHT subsequently extended its A350-900 line-maintenance support for Qatar Airways to Munich and is now able to handle AOG situations “in exceptional cases.” Steinhoff said LHT also has gained “significant experience on component repair, logistics, engineering and pool management” through supporting the A350-900s operated by Finnair, LHT’s first major customer for A350XWBMRO.

Now, LHT’s “line maintenance personnel in Bangkok are ready for A350 line maintenance services,” said Steinhoff. However, he added, LHT contributed “significantly” to the development and design of the A350XWB, its engineers participating in A350XWB focus groups conducted by Airbus and supporting the manufacturer “with respect to maintainability and maturation.”

LHT’s [MRO] portfolio for this aircraft type already comprises an extensive package of ready maintenance and repair services,” said Steinhoff. These include “fleet management, line maintenance, engineering services including troubleshooting and software management, component MRO and pool services, on-wing support on composite structures and engines and overhaul and maintenance on auxiliary power units.” LHT also partners on A350XWBMRO with Honeywell, which supplies more systems for the type than any other OEM.

Meanwhile, LHT has prepared for a large Asia Pacific requirement for A350XWB and Boeing 777X MRO by expanding two of its four existing facilities in the region. These are Lufthansa Technik Philippines (LTP) and Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen (LTS).

LTP’s recently completed hangar expansion “includes a new Boeing 777 base- and heavy-maintenance capability,” said Steinhoff. “The 777 bay is equipped with a versatile docking system that can accommodate current and future aircraft types such as the 777-9 and A350. This puts LTP on track to meet the growing demand for base maintenance of new aircraft types.”

[At LTS] we also expanded our service portfolio in Asia,” said Steinhoff. “We will have significantly more capabilities for components, including airframe-related components as well as engine services, training and logistics. We doubled the size of our facility and celebrated the opening of two new buildings recently.”

Other Asia Pacific business developments may soon happen for LHT, whose Asian facilities also include Lufthansa Technik Service India and Malaysia-based Airfoil Services. “There are other possible partners and opportunities outside China and the Philippines that could be interesting for us, which offer further possibilities,” said Steinhoff. “Talks are ongoing.”

Because of fast-growing emerging markets such as China, India and Indonesia, LHT reckons the Asia Pacific MRO market will grow at an average annual rate of 7 percent over the next 10 years, outstripping the 4 percent annual growth in the world MRO market that it forecasts for the decade.

LHT sees engine and component MRO as the “strongest drivers of growth” in the Asia Pacific MRO market–areas which are already LHT’s “strongest products, measured on volume,” according to Steinhoff. The company already handles component MRO for more than 300 aircraft in the region and operates spares pools in Hong Kong and Singapore for several aircraft types. Steinhoff said LHT’s overall business is growing especially quickly in Southeast Asia, though “geographically, we have customers in every [Asia Pacific] country.”

February 15, 2016, 10:15 AM

Pratt Ready to Support GTF in Asia-Pacific

$
0
0

Pratt & Whitney considers itself well positioned for the introduction of the PW1000G PurePower geared turbofan into revenue service in Asia, with the company having established aftermarket capability in several locations to support a backlog of some 2,000 engines in that region alone. Speaking with AIN just before the start of the Singapore Airshow, Pratt & Whitney commercial engines aftermarket vice-president Liping Xie stressed the importance of the OEM’s 90 years of experience in the aftermarket business and the volume of engines it already supports.

Since 2000 we have overhauled over 10,000 engines within our system, so that’s a lot of experience on which we can draw best practices,” he said. “We also have very strong engineering capabilities, so in the aftermarket we leverage those capabilities for repair development. In terms of cost reduction, that’s a huge differentiator for our airline customers.”

Xie also talked about the company’s emphasis on so-called big data, and its ability to use the information to better predict maintenance requirements and, thereby, extend time-on-wing and improve reliability for its customers.

Pratt maintains a global operations center in East Hartford, Connecticut, that continuously monitors fleet status and collects live data, around the clock, to provide technical feedback to customers and manage logistical arrangements. Meanwhile, a group of employees works solely on fleet management programs, under which the customer pays by the hour and the OEM takes responsibility for maintenance planning. “Experience has told us that the engines under that program we were able to deliver better reliability and also longer on-wing time,” said Xie.

The Pratt executive emphasized the importance of China, India and the Asia-Pacific region as a whole, where some 28 percent of its total backlog of PW1000Gs resides, making it a “huge focus” for the campaign. In fact, of the company’s roughly 5,000 employees at its 15 repair and overhaul centers around the globe, 3,000 work in the Asia Pacific region.

In Singapore, Eagle Services Asia–a joint venture between Pratt & Whitney and Singapore Airlines Engineering Company–specializes in PW4000 work and is the first designated engine center for the PurePower family.

A Pratt partnership with Air New Zealand in Christchurch, called Christchurch Engine Center, will specialize in PW1100G work for A320neos, while a joint venture with China Eastern Airlines in Shanghai specializes in CFM56 engines. Pratt also considers its partnership with Turkish Technik in Istanbul as part of the network that supports the Asia Pacific region.

Singapore ‘Center of Gravity’

Separately, two-thirds of Pratt & Whitney’s customer training capacity resides in the region, namely a center in Beijing and another in Hyderabad, India. The Hyderabad center opened just last September and already carries the capacity to train the equivalent of 2,000 students in a one-week class per year. Eventually, Pratt expects capacity at the facility to double.

In China, United Technologies Far East and China Aviation Supplies (CAS) Holding Company just renewed a 10-year-old joint venture supporting Pratt’s Beijing training center for another 15 years. That campus has trained some 14,000 students based in China, Russia, Singapore, Thailand and Korea on Pratt & Whitney and IAEV2500 engines.   

While much of the company’s aftermarket focus centers on preparing for the geared turbofan, the most ubiquitous engine type in the region for Pratt’s aftermarket services remains the V2500, some 6,000 of which operate around the world, said Xie. Averaging some seven years old, those engines in many cases will operate for another two decades at least, meaning they still account for a huge piece of the company’s activity well into the future. 

The V2500 has by far the largest installed base, both globally and in the region, so that’s clearly a key focus for aftermarket,” he noted. “It’s still a relatively young fleet, and some of the Vs haven’t even seen their first shop visit yet…I believe for the next 10 to 15 years the V fleet will still be one of the main profit drivers for the aftermarket.”

Xie said he expects a “seamless” transition from V2500 work to geared turbofans over that period due to its strong relationships with design partners MTU of Germany and JAEC of Japan, both of which have supported V2500s for several years. Pratt has worked with those OEM partners for some two years to help them understand parts requirements, logistics flow and other processes involved in the transition to geared turbofan support.

These people know the engines very well, just like, to some extent, Pratt & Whitney,” said Xie. “We really want to leverage that advantage and use that to support our initial wave of customers first.”

In terms of concentration of MRO work Pratt performs, Xie said Singapore remains a sort of  “center of gravity” for the region. Some 2,000 people work at what Xie characterized as four or five very important repair facilities on the island and form the hub of a network including shops in New Zealand, China and Turkey. “We have excellent people [who are] very well trained, very disciplined, process oriented, English-speaking, with a long history in maintenance practice, so [Singapore] will continue to be the center of gravity in terms of MRO activities,” said Xie. 

February 15, 2016, 10:15 AM

Protectionism Still Winning as Liberalization Stalls

$
0
0
airport

In the 49 years since its conception, the 10-member Association of Southeast Asia Nations (Asean) has been gradually moving towards greater liberalization of its air transport services. In line with this strategy is the Asean Single Aviation Market (ASAM)–an ambitious open-skies scheme that was intended to further liberalize air services under a unified air transport market by the end of 2015.

Asean’s self-imposed deadline has now come and gone, with three members–the Philippines, Indonesia and Laos–reluctant to ratify the full agreement. The plan was for all carriers from Asean to enjoy unlimited third, fourth and fifth freedom operations within the region. To date, Indonesia remains opposed to opening up its secondary cities, the Philippines has excluded Manila from the agreement and Laos has yet to free up Luang Prabang and the national capital Vientiane.  

Given that Indonesia and the Philippines are Asean’s two largest nations by population, their decision to stay out prevents the project from being fully realized. At the same time, the ASAM liberalization agenda remains relatively modest. Only third, fourth and fifth freedoms are currently being considered, while seventh-freedom relaxations and the right to cabotage have yet to be addressed. Accordingly, the ASAM falls short of a true open skies policy.

The third-, fourth- and fifth-freedoms are addressed in two multilateral agreements that have already come into force. The multilateral agreement on air services (MAAS) liberalizes market restrictions among Asean capital cities while the multilateral agreement for the full liberalization of passenger air services (MAFLPAS) frees up secondary cities and sub regions.

Indonesia has agreed to open access to Jakarta but has yet to ratify relevant protocols under MAFLPAS. As such, traffic rights into points other than Jakarta remain restricted by existing bilateral air services agreements.

Indonesia’s decision to refrain from joining a true ASAM is due largely to it wanting to protect against competitors, particularly from Singapore and Malaysia. Indonesia has the ability to offer regional carriers hundreds of unlimited access points, while many countries can offer only one point of access. This systematic imbalance for exchange of traffic rights has led Indonesian carriers, such as Garuda, to lobby their government to refrain from entering into Asean multilateral agreements.

While airlines from other Asean states now have unlimited rights to fly into Jakarta from their own capitals, it is well known that there is limited slot capacity at Jakarta’s congested Soekarno-Hatta Airport. Built to handle 22 million passengers annually, the airport currently handles roughly three times that volume.

An $805 million expansion plan of Soekarna-Hatta is currently underway that aims to boost passenger capacity to 62 million people. However, according to the International Air Transport Association (IATA), the capacity problem plaguing Jakarta is nowhere near being solved, even with the terminal upgrades. IATA estimates that Indonesia could be serving 270 million passengers by 2034

Meanwhile, the Philippines has opted to exclude Manila’s Ninoy Aquino International Airport from the agreement, citing runway congestion and a shortage of airport slots. The airport’s four terminals have a combined design capacity of 31 million passengers. In 2015, Manila handled 36 million passengers, representing an increase of 7.6 percent increase from the previous year.

As an alternative, the Philippines has agreed to liberalize secondary cities under MAFLPAS, including Clark International, which is already open to Asean carriers.  While Clark has the available infrastructure capacity, the airport is 62 miles from Metro Manila with very little connectivity infrastructure available.

In pockets of Southeast Asia, such as Jakarta and Manila, there is substantial growth opportunity, but the chronic lack of infrastructure is stifling that demand with no magic wand to change in the short term,” said Mark Clarkson, business development director for Asia Pacific at OAG.

Clarkson said that smaller regional airports will eventually emerge to absorb some of the growth. Infrastructure developments are also underway in several Asean countries including a $3 billion plan to expand Singapore’s Changi airport with a fifth terminal and a $100 million project in Cambodia to upgrade passenger terminals at Phnom Penh and Siem Reap.

In Thailand, both Bangkok Suvarnabhumi International Airport and Don Mueang are earmarked for expansion. Vietnam is also poised to expand provincial airports and build a new gateway airport to serve Ho Chi Minh City.

February 15, 2016, 10:30 AM

Manufacturers Look to Asia as Engine of Growth

$
0
0
Embraer E190

Asia Pacific airlines will need 12,500-to-15,000 new aircraft in the coming 20 years, say Airbus and Boeing. This demand follows 10 years of rapid industry growth, during which the region’s jetliner fleet has doubled in size, from 2,900 aircraft to 5,850, with jet operators growing 50 percent in number from 150 to 225, according to Boeing’s Current Market Outlook (CMO). Meanwhile, capacity (available seat-miles/kilometres [ASM/ASKs]) has grown annually by 7 percent as the number of airline routes to, from and within Asia has increased by 57 percent, from 2,200 to 3,800.

Airbus puts Asia Pacific as the region with highest 20-year demand: 12,600 jet airliners and freighters (including almost 5,000 in the coming 10 years), representing about 39 percent of global requirements for “close to 32,600” aircraft noted in its 2015-34 Global Market Forecast (GMF). Boeing projects a world demand for 38,050 new commercial aircraft during the next 20 years.

Asian gross domestic product (GDP) and passenger-traffic growth will drive Boeing’s estimated need for 14,330 machines worth a nominal $2,200 billion at catalogue prices, with low-cost carriers (LCCs) accounting for some 10,370 single-aisle units (see box).

Bombardier’s Commercial Aircraft Forecast for the period sees demand for 4,250 smaller regional-jet (RJ) and turboprop deliveries in the overall 60- to 150-seat segment, split three ways: Greater China 2,450, Asia Pacific 1,100, and South Asia 700, including 2,450 with 100 or more seats. The company values its predicted global requirement for 12,700 aircraft at $650 billion, with the smaller 60- to 100-seat sector remaining “one of the most dynamic” in commercial aviation.

It says that airlines in “various stages [of] development” in emerging regions will require aircraft with “various capacities and competitive operating economics to [meet] passenger demand.” Not surprisingly, the Canadian manufacturer of the recently certified CSeries single-aisle jetliner suggests that, globally, the 100- to 150-seat segment will witness a “major fleet transformation with [introduction] of new designs.”

Embraer projects an Asia Pacific 20-year market for 6,350 RJs and turboprops: 2,250 in the 70- to 90-seat class and 4,100 with 90-130 seats, together worth $300 billion. The region’s fleet of such aircraft will increase from 2,590 to 6,490 by 2034; China will require 3,810 aircraft offering with capacity for 70-210 passengers (see box), with China and Asia Pacific accounting for 38 percent of global traffic by 2034, says Embraer’s 2015-34 Market Outlook (see tables for summary of manufacturers' forecasts).

Growing trade links between countries will promote local economic prosperity and require improved air links, says the Brazilian manufacturer. It sees Australia, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, South Korea, Thailand, Taiwan, and Vietnam driving the region’s economic expansion.

Greater affordability and accessibility will stimulate demand for air travel in established markets and allow airlines to expand in low- and mid-density markets,” according to Embraer. “Over the next 20 years, the market will grow 5.1 percent annually.”

Airbus sees reliance on consumer demand in developed markets and inherent vulnerability to slumps in mature economies as having prompted emerging economies to move from export- and investment-led growth models to focus on greater domestic spending. “Policy makers in emerging markets are well aware that conventional export-led growth by Asian economies is unlikely to be sustainable over the longer-term and that economic growth increasingly needs to come from domestic consumption.”

While Asia remains “very dependent” on exports, Airbus expects domestic sources of growth, particularly private consumption, to play a larger role. “Asia Pacific will continue to have high economic growth, mainly due to openness to trade, high domestic saving, and a relatively well-educated and disciplined labor force, factors [that] will continue to attract the bulk of global foreign investment.”

The manufacturer cites forecasts that see the Asia Pacific continuing to lead global economic growth in real GDP and in trade. “The region is also destined to become the dominant manufacturing center and main consumer of non-oil primary commodities.”

Despite slower than anticipated world economic recovery, Bombardier expects demand for new aircraft, with replacements in established markets and growth potential in areas such as Greater China and South Asia predicted to lead deliveries. For Airbus, sharply lower oil prices are expected to support “long-awaited acceleration in global economic growth,” with the “big beneficiaries” including major net importers of oil such as China, India, Japan, and South Korea.

Nevertheless, that acceleration will likely not be spread equally, even within sub-regions with the highest growth: rather, Airbus sees metropolitan locations as the main beneficiaries as long-haul traffic continues to concentrate around so-called “mega-cities” – aviation hubs with more than 10,000 long-haul passengers/day. In Asia Pacific, for example, the top 20 largest airports account for almost 50 percent of total traffic, and the region will involve “half of 2034’s top 20 traffic flows,” according to the GMF. The region also contains the world’s sixth- to tenth-largest mega-cities, which rank below London, three other unidentified “advanced world” locations, and Dubai in the Middle East.

Seeking to quantify the scale of traffic, Boeing sees “a billion passengers” a year currently travelling to, from, or within Asia, with “more than 100 million” new passengers projected to enter the market annually. The manufacturer reports that Asia is “expected to be the [world’s] largest travel market, growing at 6.1 percent annually,” driven over the next 20  years by 4.3 percent/year regional GDP growth that will be mixed among  mature, developing, and emerging sub-markets.

Embraer says that liberalization in Asia, which has been concentrated in links between large cities, will play a key role in the development of non-trunk routes, as 70 percent of low-density intra-regional markets have no non-stop flights. “Further liberalization is needed to fully realize the wholesale effects of connecting medium and smaller communities,” concludes its forecast. Airbus predicts that 60 percent of Asia Pacific traffic will be intra-regional by 2034, compared with 2014’s 55 percent, a proportion strongly driven by trade and immigration.

Analyzing traffic flows, Boeing notes that the region’s full-service carriers–which include “large, old, and well-regarded” operators that tend to have major hubs for domestic, regional, and international services and large, complex fleets–are slowly beginning to change. “Traditional Asia Pacific network carriers are evolving to satisfy passenger needs, continually upgrading their fleets for efficiency.”

Operators such as Australia’s Qantas, Singapore Airlines, and Thai Airways International have created their own LCCs that in some cases are making inroads into traditional business areas. Airbus says LCC penetration into domestic markets in emerging Asian countries accounts for nearly 60 percent of capacity, while among domestic markets in the Indian subcontinent it is almost 65 percent.

Outside regional services, Boeing’s forecast says that growth in Chinese long-haul operations since 2010 has been 18 percent, while that in Japan has been half that rate; such market dynamics will drive demand for twin-aisle jetliners in the region to 3,590 machines by 2034.

Beyond passenger services, Airbus recognizes that air cargo plays a crucial role in Asia, which is home to many of the “largest and most efficient” operators. The market is expected to grow by 5.7 percent/year, leading to regional requirements for 380 new freighters and 570 converted machines, according to the GMF.

The manufacturer's predictions see express cargo continuing to develop more rapidly than general cargo, driven partly by domestic and regional traffic in emerging areas such as China and Southeast Asia. Medium-haul regional cargo traffic will “surge,” with development of cargo networks in regions such as intra-Asia, concludes the European manufacturer

China shop

Three decades of rapid economic growth in China have established a thriving middle class, according to the Airbus 2015-34 Global Market Forecast. Boeing expects that this growing population group, complemented by “new visa policies and the underlying strength of the country’s economic growth” will lead Chinese expansion “to continue and, in fact, accelerate.”

The decade between 2004 and 2014 saw China increase its share of the region’s traffic from 23 percent to 31 percent, while airlines domiciled in the country raised their capacity from 26 percent to 33 percent, says Airbus.

With the region being home to five of the 10 largest “mega-cities”–aviation hubs with more than 10,000 long-haul passengers daily–China’s biggest hubs at Beijing and Shanghai will see 2015-34 traffic growth of 400 percent “and it is estimated that they will become larger than London” was in 2014 (120,000 long-haul travellers/day), according to Airbus.

Such increasing traffic will stimulate 20-year demand for 6,330 new airplanes nominally worth $950 billion, says the Boeing Current Market Outlook: “China’s commercial airplane fleet will nearly triple: from 2,570 airplanes in 2014 to 7,210 airplanes in 2034, with more than 70 percent of these deliveries accommodating growth.” 

The U.S. manufacturer foresees the country becoming “the world’s largest domestic air travel market,” with a requirement for 4,630 single-aisle airplanes in the period, with Chinese low-cost carriers’ share of single-aisle market demand rising from 8 percent to 25- to 30 percent by 2034. Meanwhile, China’s twin-aisle fleet will need 1,510 new machines, led by small and medium-size units, says Boeing, which notes that Chinese airlines have “more than doubled” international long-haul capacity in the past three years.

Confirming the positive long-term outlook for China, with 5.6 percent annual GDP growth driving a stronger 7 percent annual traffic increase through 2034, Embraer adds a cautionary note that “the Chinese economy continues to show signs of gradually slowing.” The Brazilian manufacturer of regional and short-haul aircraft points out the value to that industry of Chinese government policies designed to develop the economies of the country’s western region.

The Civil Aviation Administration of China plans to construct more regional airports to improve the operation and management of the [airline] system [and] is encouraging the introduction of regional aircraft by offering subsidies,” notes Embraer. “The current five-year plan identifies 70 new airports and feasibility studies for 28 more.”

Airbus says that western China “will experience higher [growth than eastern areas] within the next decade. This movement of economic activity westward should be mirrored by aviation development.” For Embraer, that means start-up airlines will exploit opportunities to grow quickly from small bases where there are sufficient time slots and subsidies from local governments.

As the country becomes more integrated and major airports congested, airlines will be further encouraged to look to secondary markets as the next frontier for expansion. Efficient regional integration requires both smaller aircraft and a fleet that is flexible to serve a range of missions,” concludes Embraer. “Access to air travel will grow throughout [China], but it will increase twice as fast in second- and third-tier cities, especially in the countryside.”

Regional fare

Asia Pacific has seen particularly successful application of low-cost carrier (LCC) business models, says Boeing. LCCs in the region have generated a 24.5 percent 10-year average annual growth, compared with Europe’s 13.4 percent/year and North America’s much more modest 2.2 percent rate, according to its Current Market Outlook. In Southeast Asia, LCCs are flying nearly 20,000 weekly flights, while Japan’s large high-speed rail network and ageing population have contributed to slower growth among such operators in northeast Asia.

In contrast, Airbus notes “various levels of growth in [Asia Pacific] LCCs in recent years. Operators in the Indian subcontinent and what the manufacturer terms “Asia Emerging” have captured close to 65 percent and 60 percent of total domestic traffic, respectively, while their market share in “Asia Developed” and Australia and New Zealand have remained below 25 percent.

The manufacturer says that new LCCs in Asia Emerging benefit from there being fewer incumbent airlines, the growth in new flyers, and developing liberalization. However, this has been offset within, or between, developed countries by a narrowed gap in recent years between LCC and full-service carrier “product offerings” and business models.

China is the latest region to embrace the LCC model, with a large increase in the number of entrants in the past two years,” says Boeing. Airbus says that Chinese LCCs have captured greater than 10 percent market share intra-regionally, but less than 5 percent domestically.

The large inflow of Asia Pacific LCC capacity (available seat-miles/kilometres) in the past 10 years has influenced ticket prices and created a vicious cycle, according to Embraer: “Lower yields force lower unit costs, leading to larger aircraft that add more capacity which, in turn, [reduce] load factors that promote even more fare discounting. As a result, yields have been declining.”

Embraer sees profitability as remaining “elusive for Asian carriers facing the challenge of surplus capacity, even though most economies across the Asia Pacific region continue to grow. The marginal cost of flying an extra seat is often higher than the lower fare it generates and ever-lower fares induce the need for ever-lower costs,” concludes the manufacturer's 2015-34 market outlook.

Footnote

*It would be unwise to analyze the four forecasts too closely, however, since the manufacturers appear not to share a common geographic definition of Asia (or Asia Pacific). For forecast purposes, Airbus uses the generic “Asia Pacific,” while its accompanying commentary refers to “Asia Advanced,”  “Asia Developed,” and “Asia Emerging” sub-markets. Boeing’s outlook says “Asia,” comprising China, the Indian subcontinent (“south Asia”), and Australia and NZ (“Oceania”) elements, but sometimes excludes China from Asia observations. Bombardier has three forecast areas: Asia Pacific, Greater China, and South Asia; while Embraer’s forecasts for the region are divided into Asia Pacific and China (including Hong Kong, Macau, and Mongolia).

February 15, 2016, 10:50 AM

Trent 7000 for neo Makes First Runs

$
0
0
Rolls-Royce and Airbus expect to log about 120 hours’ flying over about nine months with the new 97,000-pound-thrust Trent XWB-97 engine for the stretched A350-1000 XWB on the airframe manufacturer’s A380 flying testbed.

Rolls-Royce new Trent 7000  demonstrator unit made an “initial power run” for the first time about three months ago. The latest offering from R-R is the seventh member of the engine family and is destined to provide exclusive power for the Airbus A330neo (for “new engine option”) that is scheduled to enter service in 2017.

The demonstrator is being used to establish the key technical features of the engine, which combines experience from the A330’s current Trent 700, architecture from the Trent 1000-TEN (designed to power the Boeing 787-10), and technology from the Trent XWB, the manufacturer’s latest large civil engine.

The 68,000- to 72,000-pound-thrust Trent 7000 is planned to provide “significant” performance benefits, compared with the Trent 700, improving specific fuel consumption by 10 percent, doubling the bypass ratio and reducing noise by half.

To meet A330neo requirements, R-R (Stand N23) has adapted the Trent 1000-TEN to incorporate a new electronic engine control unit, new gearbox, air-start capability, and related changes. Before beginning series production, the manufacturer will assemble four development examples of the engine, which also sports a new nacelle and electronic bleed-air system that uses A350 technology.

The UK-based enginemaker recently celebrated a successful first 12 months of revenue passenger service with the 84,000-pound-thrust Trent XWB-84 engine on the first Airbus A350-900 XWB (for “extra wide body”) twin-aisle twinjet. The company claims that the milestone, reached in mid-January, was achieved “in an exemplary fashion” with a technical dispatch reliability rate of 99.83 percent. Thirty Trent XWBs entered service on newly delivered A350s during last year.

Airbus expects the first stretched A350-1000 airframe to enter final assembly line this month [February]. It is to be powered by the Trent XWB-97, now undergoing a nine-month, 120-hour flying program on an A380 testbed. The A350-1000 is planned to fly in the fourth quarter of the year, the schedule having slipped slightly from an earlier mid-2016 target, and to enter service about 12 months later, following certification work with three flight examples.

Testing of the Trent XWB-97, which is fitted at the A380’s No 2 (port-side, inboard) position, began with demonstration of a wide range of power settings at altitudes of up to 35,000 ft and evaluation of operability and handling qualities from low speed up to Mach 0.87. Other work includes high-temperature and icing-condition test campaigns, and confirmation of the engine-relight envelope, according to R-R head of Trent XWB marketing Tim Boddy.

Initial flights aimed at fine-tuning engine integration and “de-risking” the A350-1000’s early flight-test program. Later work is expected to concentrate on “maturity tests,” including further thermal-endurance and cyclic trials.

While testbed flying continues in France, R-R has focused on “industrialization” of the initial 84,000-pound-thrust Trent XWB-84 engine as it accelerates production for the A350-900. Boddy reports a “smooth transition” from XWB pre-production operations, with a new build line established at its Derby (UK) factory.

Before in-flight testing, the manufacturer had completed 150 hours of XWB-97 endurance testing, including 16+ hours at maximum take-off thrust and 42 hours at maximum continuous thrust. R-R has ground-run the XWB-97 at up to 99,000 pounds’ thrust after having earlier demonstrated 112,000 pounds’ thrust with an XWB-84 variant during “blade-out” testing.

It also completed XWB-97 icing and X-ray testing last year, with “good results” that provided grounds for “high confidence” of achieving performance targets, according to Boddy. R-R sees “huge synergies” between the parallel XWB-84 and -97 engine programs. “We need to gather certification evidence from bench- and flight-testing before the A350-1000 first flight,” said Boddy.

To meet Airbus assembly plans for about 10 aircraft a month, manufacture of Trent XWBs is being ramped up over about two years from 2.6 per week in late 2015 to 4.9 (including about one TXWB-97) a week before 2018. By next year, R-R expects to be building one XWB a day, the company having successfully achieved a parts-supply and production trial that saw “four engines assembled in four days.” Overall XWB production should reach 6.4/week by mid-2019, with monthly output comprising about 17 XWB-84s and around ten -97s.

Although production engines will not feature the technology until it has been “industrialized,” the XWB-97 is also the first R-R engine having a major additive-layer manufactured structure–the 1.5-m (around 60-inch)-diameter, titanium low- and intermediate-pressure compressor front-bearing housing.

R-R has dedicated Trent XWB-84 and -97 teams to translate testing lessons into powerplant maturity as production increases and the company develops service capabilities covering parts, spares, and training “to build inherent support.” Its venture into ALM has been driven by plans to improve Trent efficiency that also have contributed to major technology developments, including low-emission combustion systems, composite fan blades, and gearbox technologies that could appear on planned Advance and UltraFan engine programs.

Up to the beginning of this year, five XWB-97s – including the flying-testbed example – had been run, logging almost 1,000 hours and 1,500 cycles. Two further planned units include the seventh XWB-97 that incorporates fan and core modules from previous test engines.

Three units were in test, the third built (but the first -97 to run) having been used for rain and hail trials, after completion of system integration and “successful” large-bird ingestion. Two test engines also have been run at R-R’s Stennis facility in the U.S., one equipped to measure 2,000+ parameters of performance as the company sought to “gather as much telemetry as possible,” according to Boddy.

One XWB-97 continues in performance and fan testing (and is likely to remain so for several more months), including fan “flutter” and cross-wind trials. It also has been used in nacelle/thrust-reverser unit integration. Another was used for simulating typical flight cycles, which R-R has usually conducted in batches of 1,000 (but which Boddy suggested last year might not continue beyond about 600).

February 15, 2016, 11:00 AM

Honeywell Eyes $15 billion Opportunity on Comac’s C919

$
0
0
Though China’s C919 has had its peaks and valleys, Honeywell president for Aerospace Asia Pacific Briand Greer remains bullish on opportunities for long-term value in its involvement in both.

Honeywell’s partnership with the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (Comac) C919 program represents a $15 billion opportunity for the U.S. company, its top regional aerospace official told AIN in the run-up to the Singapore Airshow.

It’s going to be a great aircraft. If you read deeper into the aircraft, it will be very competitive with the aircraft that are flying right now,” said Briand Greer, president, Honeywell Aerospace Asia Pacific. “It’s not old, but current, technology.”

Comac’s efforts to develop a domestic aircraft to take on the market’s dominant narrow-body players, the Boeing 737 and the Airbus A320, have faced repeated setbacks. Despite delays, the arrival in November of a prototype represented new progress.

Honeywell joined the project in 2010, when Comac invited it to provide four essential components, “including flight control systems, wheels and brakes, auxiliary power units, and navigation systems,” the company said.

Honeywell also offered engineering and training support to Comac to improve the safety, reliability and operational efficiency of the C919. “It’s the first big thing they have done where they are aiming to be Western-certified,” he said.

Greer conceded estimates for the C919’s entry into widespread service in 2018-20 were optimistic, saying it was probably more realistic to look at 2025-30.

They have 400 orders for the aircraft right now, mostly within China. If you look at what’s going to happen in terms of China’s airports overall, demand for single-aisle [aircraft] is quite remarkable. In the last 10 years, the number of aircraft in Asia grew from 3,000 to 6,000. In the next 10 years, it will see 7,000 more.”

The Civil Aviation Administration of China plans to help domestic and foreign airlines open more than 200 international routes in 2016. Last year, Chinese travelers took 120 million international trips, a year-on-year increase of 16 percent.

ARJ21 Delays

Honeywell is also a key contributor to another delayed Chinese aircraft program, the ARJ21, a regional twin-turbofan, which saw the first aircraft delivered to launch customer, Chengdu Airlines, also in November.

Honeywell helped develop, produce and support the primary flight control system for the aircraft. The airline hopes to put the ARJ21-700 into commercial operation in early 2016 on routes from Chengdu to Beijing and Shanghai. Honeywell said Comac had already received more than 300 domestic orders for the aircraft.

Airport development is also an important sphere for Honeywell. In 2016, Greer said China is spending $11.7 billion on airports and civil infrastructure.

This year, it plans to open 10 new airports, including a second in Beijing, and to upgrade 50 more. In the next five years, China will build 66 new civil airports, increasing the total number 32 percent to 272.

Defense

Greer said that defense is also an important area for the company in the Asia Pacific region. Honeywell supports defense platforms including the C130 transport, F-15 fighter and CH47 Chinook helicopter.

Many of the defense budgets throughout Asia [other than China which is fast-growing but inaccessible for U.S. companies] are growing. The countries here realize that their economic future is tied to China. From a military perspective, new aircraft or upgrades are a huge opportunity for us.”

Honeywell’s latest Global Business Aviation Outlook gave a bleak assessment of the BRIC market, saying: “Slight improvements in Chinese and Russian purchase plans compared with last year are not enough to support an improved overall BRIC outlook.”

Greer prefers to play down the short-term malaise. “This will be the fastest-growing market for business and general aviation for many years to come. All of the things in the West we have known for a long time have simply not existed here.”

Data-driven Future

Aircraft flight efficiency and optimization is an important area for Honeywell also. An aircraft generates 1terabyte of data on a single flight, which can be used to optimize flights and send information to the MRO base waiting to service the aircraft.

All of this information around productivity between systems will rewrite the book on being proactive with prognostics,” Greer said.

He added that 10 percent of Honeywell’s 12,000 China-based employees work in aerospace. He is based in China and said he spends “50-60 percent” of his time there.

In terms of technology, recent data show that more than 4,000 companies are incorporated in China every day. “That shows you again [China’s growth] from a scale perspective,” said Greer.

My personal view is that China is not a house of cards. They have some difficult things to deal with in terms of government investment, manufacturing and consumption. Sure, that’s a very difficult thing for economies to do. If anyone can do it, it’s China. Like it or not, the government has the ability to turn the ship very quickly,” said Greer.

He said all the most important businesses were part of the [ruling Communist] party, meaning things could be done more quickly than anywhere else in the world. “Growth may be ‘only’ 7 percent or 6 percent, but it is still the second-largest economy in the world–it grew more in one year than entire size of the Mexican economy. Though growth is down, it is still very significant in many areas. We still see very robust aviation demand growth.”

February 15, 2016, 11:30 AM

Honeywell’s ATM Division Progresses in Asia-Pacific

$
0
0
Honeywell’s satellite-based SmartPath, SmartRunway and SmartLanding air traffic management systems could be beneficial to China’s rapidly expanding airport infrastructure. The technology permits reduced spacing for landing aircraft, among many other safety and usage improvements.

Growing numbers of aircraft pose increasing difficulties for the smooth management of busy airports and airspace, says Honeywell (Stand G39). But this can be alleviated, a leading air traffic management (ATM) official told AIN, in part by introducing advanced systems that can allow different angles of approach to avoid wake turbulence. Other ways to improve the situation include savvier ways to get departing aircraft from gates to taxiways, he said.

The U.S. company is working on several initiatives in the Asia Pacific region to deliver its SmartPath, SmartRunway and SmartLanding systems. This is expected to help regional airlines and airports avoid the growing pressure at airports, said Paul Nef, director ATM initiatives. “Even though growth rates appear to be slowing, air traffic rates appear to be keeping pace [in the region],” he said.

Shanghai’s Pudong Airport announced in April it had completed flight demonstrations under Honeywell’s SmartPath, a Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS). It said that the technology was especially valuable in bad-weather, low-visibility situations (and China has a lot of smog).

Honeywell also installed its SmartPath technology at Sydney Airport in 2014, allowing suitably equipped aircraft to approach on a predictable, precise landing path, correcting minor GPS errors and transmitting the ultra-precise data directly to an aircraft’s flight management system.

Nef said the technology could reduce a typical five-minute interval between an arriving Airbus A380 flying a 2.8-degree glideslope angle, and a smaller aircraft seeking to avoid its wake vortices. By directing the second aircraft to fly a steeper approach angle of 3.5 degrees, for example, (with the information delivered digitally to its flight management system) the smaller aircraft could safely land without being affected by the earlier, larger aircraft. “Significantly smaller amounts of time between landings would dramatically increase the number of aircraft [that could be processed],” he said.

Incheon Airport in Korea also installed Honeywell systems for ground traffic management as early as 2009. SmartRunway prevents runway incursions, while SmartLanding is designed to prevent aircraft approaching the runway too high or too fast.

[A] key safety issue and NTSB [U.S. National Transportation Safety Board] concern is the appropriate energy level [speed] for landing, required landing distance, and adequate safety margin when landing; all key areas that are addressed with Honeywell’s SmartLanding package,” Honeywell said.

Pressure on airspace is also growing because of the need for coordination between civilian and military fleets in places like China. “Similar things are happening in China to what’s happening in the Middle East. Civilian-military is a complicating factor that continues to affect the way things are done,” Nef said. The high incidence of low-cost-carrier traffic is also complicating the regional picture.

Air travel within Asia continues to grow. If you look at the type of traffic flowing in Southeast Asia, the low-cost carriers are more prevalent. Their needs are somewhat different, with shorter routes of one- to 1.5 hours’ flying time, which is different from United Airlines flying to Asia Pacific. The mix of airports continues to be a challenge,” he explained.

An additional complication on the ground is that Asia Pacific airports, especially in China, find it difficult to create the right business mix to become profitable. While retail and food and beverage facilities are increasingly prevalent, they may not be enough.

Nef said, “In most cases where infrastructure is being built, the challenge is for investors to figure out a way to get their money back. Landing fees alone aren’t enough.”

Honeywell is likely to stay at the forefront of the international players in the region. “We see that the Chinese authorities are looking to the rest of the world and what’s going on there, but the direction and speed of progress is based on its own local needs,” he concluded. 

February 15, 2016, 11:45 AM

Bombardier Ramps Up Q400 Sales Pitch in Asia

$
0
0

While it should come as no surprise that the C Series narrowbody on display here serves as the centerpiece of Bombardier’s presence at this Singapore show, the Canadian company’s sales aspirations for the region extend well beyond its newest product. Speaking with AIN just ahead of the start of the show, Bombardier Aerospace commercial vice president Colin Bole acknowledged that the company had let its laser focus on the C Series compromise efforts to sell Q400 turboprops in the region. Consequently, ATR has assumed an undeniably dominant position in the market, particularly in Southeast Asia, where the likes of Garuda Indonesia, Lion Air, Bangkok Airways and MASWings operate more than 300 of the Franco-Italian turboprops.

Although Bombardier (Chalet CD61) has sold Q400s in significant numbers to SpiceJet in India, QantasLink in Australia, ANA Wings of Japan and Japan Air Lines subsidiary Ryukyu Air Commuter, the company sees more potential to add to its Southeast Asian base in particular.

To be very candid, we dropped behind in terms of market share in the Q400 against our competitor, I think primarily because we had our eye off the ball and too focused on the C Series,” said Bole. “We’re re-emphasizing the Q400 in the Asia Pacific region and we will certainly be coming out with some interesting new messages at the Singapore Airshow around that aircraft type.”

Bole cited Nok Air of Thailand as a prime example of the potential the Q400 holds for Southeast Asian airlines that need a high-capacity turboprop capable of carrying as many as 86 passengers. He also emphasized the Q400’s “quasi-jet” capability which, he said, allows airlines to more easily integrate the turboprop into a broader jet operation. “We’ve got a number of operators around the world that successfully operate hub-and-spoke operations or intermixed Q400s with 737s in particular, and Nok Air is actually one of those examples,” said Bole.

Bombardier also advertises the Q400’s “jet-like” appearance, characterized by front-door boarding, as opposed to the rear-door entrance in the ATRs. Meanwhile, the Q400’s baggage compartment resides in the back of the aircraft in a more traditional airline configuration, rather than between the cockpit and the cabin as in the ATRs. Finally, Bole pitched the Q400’s active noise suppression system, which, he said, “basically gives a jet feel in terms of the overall cabin environment.”

Although a bigger, faster and more expensive airplane than the ATR, the Q400 can operate just as efficiently as its competitor, insisted Bole. “One of the nice things about it is that, of course you can operate it with high-performance, and we have a cruise speed that can be close to 100 knots higher than the ATR. But on the other hand, you can easily throttle back and operate at a more traditional turboprop speed,” he said. “So you can trade off speed versus time without any noticeable penalty.”

The benefits boil down to the specific routes a particular operator flies, and that applies to the effect of falling fuel prices as well. For inter-island traffic, for example, or flying into small airports, a turboprop will always have an advantage over a jet, said Bole, who opined that airlines do not generally make fleet decisions based on spot fuel prices.

You’ve got to think of an airline making a decision typically for 30 to 40 years,” he said. “They’re deciding not on one aircraft but on a fleet of aircraft that will come in over the next two, three, four, five, six years, then will be operating for 20 or 25 years, and the tail end of that fleet will then be probably around for another five years.

And the other thing is…it’s very much a matter of hedging. An airline isn’t replacing 100 percent of its fleet at once. It is typically looking at 10, 15, 20 percent of its fleet being rolled over. So of course there is a fuel impact, but it’s so diluted at the end of the day that airlines are still very focused on the operational matters…fuel burn is an element, but it’s not as important as people often think.”

February 15, 2016, 12:00 PM

Boeing Shanghai Expands Maintenance Business

$
0
0

Boeing Shanghai Aviation Services recently signed a heavy maintenance agreement with Thomas Cook Airlines for supporting the UK carrier’s Boeing 767 fleet. Two Thomas Cook 767s have already gone to Boeing Shanghai’s facilities at Pudong International Airport to undergo extensive C-checks and another aircraft is due to arrive in the next few weeks.

The maintenance provider is a joint venture between Boeing, the Shanghai Airport Authorities and China Eastern Airlines. Last year, Boeing Shanghai became the first Chinese company to be granted Part 21 design organization approval from the European Aviation Safety Agency. Its airline customers include operators from across Asia as well as countries such as Russia.

February 15, 2016, 12:20 PM

Asian Carriers Face a Bumpy Flight Path

$
0
0

At yesterday’s Singapore Airshow Aviation Leadership Summit, Singapore minister for transport Khaw Boon Wan warned of a darkening economic outlook and its potential for slowing air transport growth. Even collapsing oil prices, which on its face might seem to benefit the region’s airlines, reflect the highly volatile economic environment and could portend a slowdown in travel demand, he said.

Nevertheless, the minister predicted a good long-term outlook for aviation growth, which in itself raises challenges to air navigation service providers (ANSPs), for example. The number of passengers within ASEAN has tripled in the last decade, while the number of routes has grown by almost 40 percent to more than 1,500 city pairs, he noted.

Still, the industry continues to lag in profitability, noted IATA general director Tony Tyler. Even though fuel prices have fallen, the rise of the U.S. dollar by some 20 percent over the last 18 months has significantly limited the positive effect, Tyler said. Second, while Asia Pacific accounts for some 40 percent of the world’s air cargo market, “business has never been so tough” in that sector, he added. After peaking at $67 billion a few years ago, air cargo revenues will fall to some $50 million, projects IATA. Finally, the region’s competitive environment in general continues to grow more intense. At the regional level, low-fare carriers now control 54 percent of the market—the highest in the world.

Meanwhile, so-called “super connectors” of the Persian Gulf have increased competition in the Asia Pacific carriers’ traditional markets from Europe to Asia and down to Australia.

For Wan, the region’s reaction must involve so-called air service liberalization.

Externally, ASEAN is working with partners such as China, the EU and others to conclude liberal air service agreements,” said Wan. “The EU and ASEAN are exploring a comprehensive air transport agreement, following the EU-ASEAN Aviation Summit at the sideline of the last airshow.”

Wan also cited the need to harmonize aviation regimes, share information and collaborate. “This is not just across governments, but increasingly government and industry also need to work hand-in-glove. Industry has the technical expertise, while governments set the rules of play.”

On the issue of safety, Wan cited the proliferation of unmanned aircraft and their potential threats, as well as heightened security threats from terrorist groups such as ISIS.

Air traffic volumes are rising, especially on the back of the growing middle class in emerging economies,” said Wan. “However airport capacity cannot increase overnight, and the volume of airspace for aircraft to operate is finite. And we will need to share this volume of airspace with unmanned aerial systems. Safety is an increasing challenge for Air Navigation Service Providers in such an environment.”

February 15, 2016, 12:40 PM

Singapore Airshow Ups Game in Face of Competition

$
0
0

Since its first edition in 2008, the Singapore Airshow has “cemented its position as Asia’s largest airshow,” reports Leck Chet Lam, managing director of show organizer Experia Events. This year’s show features more than 1,000 companies from 50 countries, including the top 65 global aerospace players. Twenty national pavilions and groups are participating, including first-time pavilions for Indonesia and the Philippines. Experia says the show is the “strategic platform of choice for key industry players.”

With increasing competition from shows in neighboring countries, the organizers are taking a leaf from the Singapore government’s overall economic strategy–by going upmarket and adding value. An impressive conference program on the eve of the show is being backed up by new business forums here at the event.

In order to keep the Singapore airshow relevant to today’s and tomorrow’s marketplace, the airshow is focusing on three areas: tapping into emerging opportunities, engaging in emerging dialogs, and showcasing emerging technology.

Emerging opportunities are addressed in four business forums scheduled for Wednesday and Thursday, of which three are new. France is the featured country of this year’s show, and a France-Singapore forum is being held, co-chaired by GIFAS and Singapore Technologies Aerospace and featuring 20 panelists and moderators from the two countries.

Just prior to the show, the French ambassador to Singapore, His Excellence Benjamin Dubertret, told reporters that 60 French companies are participating, while the Dassault Rafale is taking part in the aerial display. The Airbus A350XWB is another flying exhibit, the new airliner having already secured orders from 13 ASEAN airlines.

Other forums include one on Emerging Technologies, which will focus on additive manufacturing and big data analytics. The forum on Training and Simulation is particularly dear to Leck Chet Lam’s heart. The airshow boss has an aerospace engineering background, and said that the Asia-Pacific region needs many more individuals to take up this career. The fourth of these two-hour forums will discuss Asia Business, with contributions from Ameco Beijing; Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation, SR Technics and GMF AeroAsia of Indonesia.

Leck Chet Lam describes the show as a “platform for thought leadership,” evidenced by the conferences that took place before the show. The show also features various themed zones, which to some extent mirror and complement the business forums. The existing Training and Simulation Zone expands on previous years, while a new Aerospace Emerging Technology Zone is new for this year.

Singapore Growth

Singapore holds a leading place in the regional aerospace sector, and the airshow reflects that. Tan Kong Hwee, director of transport engineering for the Economic Development Board, outlined the nation’s already impressive position in the sector, with an annual growth of more than 8 percent over the past decade.

Singapore now boasts 130 aerospace companies with an $8.3 billion output. The nation has captured around 10 percent of the global MRO market share, and each year a number of important new facilities are opening. Pratt & Whitney, for instance, is opening a blade and disk manufacturing facility, and Rolls-Royce is already assembling Trent 700 engines at Seletar.

With the ASEAN region forecast to become the world’s fourth largest economy by 2050, air travel in the region continues to grow at a rapid pace, requiring greater levels of in-region aftermarket support. Also, major OEMs are looking to the region, and Singapore itself, to respond to increasing demands on the supply chain.

Singapore’s government has outlined a plan to become a globally recognized aerospace nation, with both a competent manufacturing and aftermarket presence by leading OEMs, and a range of home-grown enterprises able to service major aerospace programs. To that end, the government has committed major investment to both research and development programs, and into aerospace academic institutions. These initiatives are evident in a number of exhibits at the show.

Display Highlights

Two military types are making their first appearance here in Singapore–an Airbus A400M airlifter from the Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) and a pair of Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor stealth fighters from the U.S. Air Force. Also making show debuts are two helicopters: the Airbus H145 and Bell’s developmental 505, in mockup form. Finmeccanica has brought Project Zero, its experimental tilt-rotor, for static display.

The hour-long flying display will be dominated by heavy military metal, with quieter relief provided only by the Airbus A350XWB. There will be a coordinated display by an AH-64 Apache and F-15SG Strike Eagle of the RSAF; the French Air Force Rafale combat jet; a U.S. Air Force F-16C fighter; a C-17 airlifter; and a Su-30MKM fighter from the RMAF, the latter demonstrating a remarkable series of thrust-vectoring maneuvers.

For many the highlight will likely be the dynamic Black Eagles aerobatic team of the Republic of Korea Air Force, making a welcome return to the Singapore airshow with an expanded routine in their eight T-50 supersonic jet trainers.

Looking forward to the next Singapore airshow, and amid some speculation as to where the next show will be held (due to the work that is already underway on the expansion of Changi Airport), Leck Chet Lam reassured visitors that “we’ll still be here in 2018”.

February 15, 2016, 12:45 PM

India Promotes Gagan SBAS use to airlines, GA

$
0
0

The Airports Authority of India (AAI) is looking at an incentive-based scheme to attract commercial airlines and general aviation companies to adopt India’s “GPS Aided GEO Augmented Navigation” (Gagan)–which is equivalent to Europe’s EGNOS and the U.S.WAAS system, but for the Indian subcontinent. As such, Gagan will be the first satellite-based augmentation system (SBAS) in the world certified for approach with vertical guidance in the equatorial ionospheric region.

The AAI has also proposed that, in support of Gagan, focused technology parks are to be set up in Delhi and Bangalore, “similar to those in China for training and infrastructural resources, including manufacturing of receivers, a data center and incubating facilities,” said S.V. Satish, former general manager ATM-Gagan. Satish was recently appointed executive director of safety at AAI.

To gain the maximum benefit from en route and guided approaches to landing, operators will need to equip all aircraft with global navigation satellite system (GNSS) avionics. “The success of a program lies in the utility and will depend on the users taking [part in] the program,” said R.K. Srivastava, chairman of AAI.

The AAI board recently gave approval in principal to provide financial incentives to regional airlines. They will be funded by earmarking 5 percent of India’s Route Navigation Facility Charges. The incentive will be restricted to upgrades for aircraft equipped with retrofits or forward-fits, and airlines that have entered into an agreement with AAI for aircraft equipage.

While AAI is in discussions with airlines to implement the proposal, there has been resistance, with some Indian domestic carriers citing the high cost of associated equipment and the time needed for retrofits, training and certification. “We are trying to make the time change requirement by 2019,” said Satish.

India’s Director General Civil Aviation (DGCA), M. Sathiyavathy, confirmed last year that discussions were in the early stages: “I only hope our scheduled [airlines] and general aviation start using Gagan at an early date.” Airlines are looking for a dual-frequency multi-constellation “that will take us up to 2020,” Satish explained. This would mean the receiver market would grow, making the equipment more cost-effective.

Perhaps taking this cue, the general aviation industry has shown interest in adopting Gagan. “The enormous costs of instrument landing systems and technical feasibility of installation in terrain-challenged airports is a major concern for AAI,” said Srivastava. “Gagan procedures can be designed for any flight operation into any airport, assisting aircraft without a ground-based terminal navigation system [but maintaining the] accuracy of terminal guidance.”

Companies such as Reliance and Jindal are looking at producing Gagan receivers, with an eye to the time when procedures will have been tested and ground validation completed, said Satish. A meeting of the GA industry is scheduled in Mumbai at the end of February to encourage operators to equip their aircraft with Gagan receivers. “Companies like Reliance and Jindal that own airports and aircraft will get the best benefit of the system,” Satish said.

India has attempted to promote Gagan in neighboring countries where uplink stations will have to be installed. Satish confesses aggressive marketing is not the AAI’s forte and admits it may have to look at outsourcing this important role. Meanwhile AAI is in talks with the power sector and Geological Survey of India to adopt Gagan for their use.

AAI has indicated that India would like to start a program called HUGI (Helicopters Use Gagan in India), making instrument approaches to heliports possible. However, government-owned Pawan Hans has yet to respond to the proposal.

The challenge of Gagan, as with any SBAS, is the need to keep upgrading it to avoid obsolescence. One of the world’s four satellite-based augmentation systems, Gagan is a joint project of AAI, the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) and Raytheon.

Its advanced air navigation technology provides coverage for the entire Indian Flight Information Region via broadcast signals from two Indian-built satellites (GSAT 8 and GSAT 10). Citing advantages such as simplified approach procedures and reduced separation standards possible with SBAS navigation technology, Raytheon’s country director and senior executive for India, Nik Khanna, told AIN, “It improves the fuel efficiency of airlines operating throughout India.”

February 15, 2016, 12:45 PM

Embraer Sees Big Opportunity for Small Airliners in Asia

$
0
0
Embraer Commercial Aviation CEO Paulo Cesar de Souza e Silva

Despite deep market penetration that the world’s commercial aircraft manufacturers have already achieved in Asia, several untapped opportunities remain, particularly in the segment covering large regional jets and small narrowbodies.

This is the message from Brazil’s Embraer; market studies produced by the manufacturer show that 70- to 130-seat jets would be better in 30 percent of the markets currently served by narrowbodies in the region. In fact, more than 250 markets in the Asia Pacific region operate with less than once daily flight frequency, strongly suggesting a need to downsize equipment gauge to improve service levels.

Embraer data also shows that routes longer than 250 nautical miles account for 37 percent of all Asia Pacific regional turboprop capacity. In those cases, more capable, longer-range jets offer operating costs that can match those of turboprops, according to Embraer, suggesting yet another large untapped market for its E-Jets. Finally, Embraer counts more than 600 completely unserved markets appropriate for 70- to 130-seat jets in the Asia Pacific region.

Now present in 11 countries in Asia, Embraer counts more than 200 aircraft flying with more than 20 customers in the region. Jets account for 187 units in seven countries, most notably in China, where Embraer claims a 90-percent market share in the 100-seat category. Throughout the Asia Pacific region, Embraer has collected roughly 70 percent of the market in terms of aircraft delivered, according to its calculations.

Speaking with AIN in the days leading to the Singapore Airshow, Embraer Commercial Aviation CEO Paulo Cesar de Souza e Silva insisted that far more scope for growth lies ahead, particularly in emerging markets such as Indonesia, where Kalstar Aviation just last year took delivery of the country’s first E-Jets–a pair of E195s.

Indonesia is an excellent market for smaller jets given the geographic situation and the number of people connecting, so there’s a tremendous market opportunity there,” said Silva.

Of course, the region is immense, so there are many other opportunities. But it is important to say we are taking actions in order to tap that region, especially with the E2 now, which is coming very soon…So we believe that the region is very good for the size of the 195 E2, for instance.”

The Brazilian company finished assembling the first of its new three-member family of jets, the Pratt & Whitney PW1900G-powered E190-E2, at the end of last year and expects to fly the 106-seater by the second half of this year, possibly as early as July. Now operating its so-called iron bird in São Jose dos Campos, Brazil, Embraer plans to use four flight-test airplanes in the program, three of which it expects to fly in 2016 and the fourth–equipped with a full interior–early next year. The company plans to deliver the first E109-E2 in the first half of2018. It has scheduled the E195-E2 entry into service (EIS) a year later and the E175-E2 in2020.

While the E190-E2 serves as the baseline model and retains the E190s current seating capacity, the second model scheduled for EIS–the E195-E2–would carry three more rows of four-abreast passenger seats than the current E195 holds, giving it a maximum high-density capacity of 144 passengers once it enters service in 2019.

Many of these airlines are flying the narrowbodies inefficiently,” said Silva. “We believe that there is room for these airlines to become more efficient [by] utilizing the right size of aircraft in combination with another narrowbody.”

Silva also predicted a trend toward turboprop replacement in the region, particularly as developing markets grow. Of course, Embraer believes the smallest of the new E2 models, the E175, presents the most appropriate solution for airlines wanting to graduate to turbofan-powered equipment. “[The E175] can have an operating cost that in certain circumstances be very close to the ATR, and in certain circumstances better than the [Bombardier] Q400,” claimed Silva, referring to cases when stage lengths exceed 300 nautical miles and passenger capacity totals 84. “Of course, we haven’t done a deep, deep analysis with oil prices at $20 or $25. So this is something new,” said Silva. “But at a normalized oil price the 175 is very competitive vis-a-vis the Q400.”

Referring to China, Silva acknowledged that the country’s economic troubles have caught Embraer’s attention. “Of course we are following developments very closely,” he said. “Things started this year in a different mood in terms of the economy in general. So, of course, we are following the events very closely to make sure we can adapt. We have to be flexible, but we have also to anticipate events that might come in the near future.”

February 15, 2016, 3:00 PM

Aerolease Order Boosts Mitsubishi's MRJ Program

$
0
0

Mitsubishi Aircraft has inked a letter of intent with U.S.-based Aerolease Aviation covering firm orders for 10 MRJ90 regional jets and options on another 10, the companies announced here in Singapore yesterday. The deal marks the first for new airplanes for Aerolease, which has until now specialized in used airplanes, and mainly cargo types. The companies expect deliveries to start in 2018 and run into 2019.

Although Aerolease Aviation partner Jep Thornton acknowledged some concern over the delays that have plagued the MRJ program, he praised Mitsubishi (Stand U1) for its technological capability and expressed confidence that no further delays would hinder his plans to place the first airplane into service in 2018. “The accumulated experiences in aircraft manufacturing and strong financial background of the Mitsubishi group are great value to us,” noted Thornton.

Thornton said he and Mitsubishi Aircraft vice president of sales and marketing Yugo Fukuhara arrived at the agreement on all major points on late Friday night. Competing aircraft under consideration included the Bombardier C Series, he added. “We took a hard look at the C Series in 2008,” he said. “But we pulled back when we thought it would take some time to [for the technology] to develop. We thought the timing was good now to commit to the MRJ.”

Prospective airline operators could come from Africa, noted Thornton, although he also noted “a lot of activity going on in Europe and all over the world.”

A relatively small company established in 1986, Aerolease will not pursue what Thornton described as large, high-profile deals. Rather, Aerolease’s contribution to the program will center on expanding the MRJ’s operating base beyond the few, large U.S. and Japanese airline customers that Mitsubishi has managed to sign. 

February 16, 2016, 5:51 AM

Rolls-Royce Launches EP version of Trent XWB

$
0
0

Rolls-Royce yesterday launched an enhanced performance version of the Trent XWB to fly with Singapore Airlines A350s. The Trent XWB-84 EP offers a fuel performance improvement of one percent over the original Trent XWB-84, according to the UK aero engine manufacturer. It incorporates technologies from the higher-thrust Trent XWB-97, the company’s Advance engine program and “other future technology research.”

Rolls-Royce (Stand N23) expects to deliver the first A350-900 powered with the enhanced performance engines to Singapore Airlines in the fourth quarter of 2019. The company said it will make the version available to other customers for later delivery.

Technology improvements on the XWB-84 EP include improved turbine cooling and aerodynamics, improved secondary air system and interstage sealing, and further optimization of the XWB-84’s tip clearance control system. 

February 16, 2016, 5:54 AM

Singapore Leasing Group Orders Five More ATR 72s

$
0
0

Singapore-based leasing group Avation increased its fleet of ATR 72-600 regional airliners by ordering five more of the 70-seat twin turboprops. The $130 million contract was signed on the first day of the Singapore Airshow.

Currently, Avation has 20 ATR 72s in its lease portfolio, most of which are -600 models, flying for carriers such as Virgin Australia, Flybe, Uni Air, Air India and Fiji Airways. The new deal would take its fleet of ATRs to 35, with the remaining deliveries set to be made through 2018.

We believe the ATR 72 is the most efficient aircraft type for regional routes. It provides the lowest fuel burn and the most reduced operating costs among all regional aircraft of its category,” said Avation executive chairman Jeff Chatfield. “ATRs are superb assets for lessor. They offer great returns and also allow portfolio diversification.”

ATR chief executive Patrick de Castelbajac added, “Our success among leasing firms from all over the world underlines our product’s ability to consolidate and expand regional connectivity in very different operational environments.”

February 16, 2016, 6:18 AM

Thales To Provide Avant IFE for SIA’s A350s

$
0
0

Thales has won an order from Singapore Airlines to equip its Airbus A350XWBs with the electronics company’s Avant in-flight entertainment and Ka-band connectivity system. Thales executives believe their significant presence in Singapore helped in the decision, including its “innovation hub.”

Delivery of the cabin equipment, marketed under the InFlyt brand, is scheduled for 2018. Avant is based on the Android operating system, and Thales believes this very open and flexible platform was key in winning the contract from competitor Panasonic. Thales will assist Singapore Airlines in “constantly introducing the newest apps.”

Passengers will have access to seamless personal-device integration, USB charging and NFC payment technology. Business-class and economy passengers will enjoy full-HD displays of 17 and 12 inches, respectively. Weight and volume of the hardware have been cut by a claimed 20 percent, compared to the previous generation. Avant is already in service on the A350 with other airlines.

Thales (Stand F23) maintains an “innovation hub” in Singapore–its first one in the Eastern hemisphere. Opened in 2014, it uses “design thinking” methods, country director Jean-Noël Stock explained. Everything starts with helping the customer express its need – “it is real maieutics,” Stock said. A brainstorming phase is aimed at having as many ideas as possible emerging. The most promising ones are selected.

Then, rapid prototyping–an essential step, Stock emphasized–brings the solution to fruition. It uses a 3D printer or toy building bricks. “It is ‘quick and dirty’ but demonstrates whether the product is usable,” Stock went on. This takes place in a colored room where writing on the walls is allowed and encouraged.

A second, “more serious” room, in Stock’s words, makes it possible to “play” scenarios. After listening to user feedback, engineers enter a more conventional phase of design and development. The hub is open to all Thales teams in Singapore, and experts from other sites may be invited.

The innovation hub was inaugurated on October 14, 2014. Precisely one year later, Singapore Airlines was telling Thales its IFE product was selected. “We have shown them we could have a very close relationship, and the product can evolve according to their requirements,” Stock said. Another factor may have been the fact that Thales has IFE repair facilities at Singapore’s Changi airport.

Thales has another opportunity to grow in Asia thanks to the recommendation the civil aviation authority of China (CAAC) to install head-up displays (HUDs) in commercial aircraft cockpits. With one quarter of their fleets equipped with HUDs in 2015, Chinese airlines are expected to bring that number to 50 percent in 2020 and 100 percent in 2025. The recommendation includes dual HUDs, as both pilots thus have the same information, though compliance is not mandatory. Adding HUD technology should help deal with frequent poor visibility at a number of airports in China. The CAAC is subsidizing domestic airlines to purchase HUDs.

Thales is the only HUD supplier on Airbus aircraft and expects a surge in demand for equipping new aircraft and retrofitting others in China. India is predicted to follow suit. Airlines from other parts of the world (especially in the Middle East, according to Daniel Malka, Thales’ general manager for avionics services) are anticipating a requirement for HUDs to fly into China and are therefore ordering the hardware.

February 16, 2016, 8:15 AM
Viewing all 4332 articles
Browse latest View live